Reinventing the toilet for the 21st century

I’ve written before about the number of people in the world who lack basic toilet facilities. There are plenty of campaigns to fix that, most of them making very slow progress – at this rate it will be 200 years before water and sanitation extends across the whole of Africa. We’ll get there eventually, but when we do, it probably won’t be with what we currently recognise as a toilet.

I suspect that what you have in your bathroom is the same thing as I have in mine – a white porcelain bowl that flushes out through a pipe and away to the sewer. It’s a classic technology that’s been around in Britain since the Victorian era. The richest households had indoor flushing toilets first of course, but by the 1950s almost everyone had one.

A toilet may be simple device at the household end, but it requires an enormous amount of infrastructure, from piping, to sewers, to sewage treatment plants. It also needs a large amount of clean water for flushing, a highly inefficient system in places where water is scarce. They’re hugely expensive, and very wasteful.

So last year, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation set up a challenge to ‘reinvent the toilet’. This toilet of the future had to be affordable, and that means it has to be ‘off-grid’. It has to function without piped in water or sewerage, and without an external power source. It’s not just an attempt to find a low cost solution for developing countries though. The Foundation is looking for “an aspirational product that leapfrogs flush toilets”, in the words of Frank Rijsberman, “a product that all of us would want to use.”

It’s a great idea, and last week the winners were announced. Here’s the winning idea from the California Institute of Technology. As you can see from the picture on the right, the toilet itself is perched above that big white cistern, which is actually a solar-powered electro-chemical reactor. It breaks down water and waste to create hydrogen, which can then be stored in hydrogen fuel cells and …

Hang on a second, wasn’t this intended for the 2.5 billion people who haven’t got a toilet? Can you see this being fitted in Kibera? Hydrogen fuel cells aren’t exactly available from the street corner kiosk.

Looks like the Gates Foundation has forgotten what it was trying to do. As well as the expense and the sophistication, the winning design hasn’t even re-thought the basic flaw with the flushing toilet. It still uses a water flush, and all the innovation comes in how the water is processed. As Lloyd Alter at Treehugger writes, “this toilet isn’t dealing with waste, it is dealing with the medium that is moving the waste, the flushing water”. The second place entry from Loughborough University is only marginally better, based as it is on ‘hydrothermal carbonisation‘. Amazing technologies for sure, but not on brief.

So this is, sadly, the Foundation has not created a toilet for the 21st century. Not for most of us, anyway. The toilet of the future is still out there, waiting to be discovered. Actually, it probably exists already. Permaculturists get very excited about them – the composting toilet.

In nature, there’s no such thing as waste. Everything gets recycled, new life from old. The toilet of the future needs to recognise that human effluent is not toxic waste that has to be swept away and buried forever. Treated right, it can be a resource, returning nutrients to the soil. It is entirely possible to treat waste at home, using natural decomposition processes. Modern composting toilets simply optimize the temperature and moisture content. They operate without water, chemicals, drains or a septic tank. If you’re still imagining a hole in the ground, here’s one on the left – you can buy it here.

The most sophisticated composting toilets use a small amount of electricity for ventilation, mixing and so on. You can make them without electricity too, they just work a little slower.

For developing countries, the best solution might be dehydrating toilets rather than composting toilets. These use air-flow to evaporate the water content from waste, reducing its bulk by about 90% and producing a dry and safe compost at the end of it.

At the moment, waterless toilets are considered the province of organic gardeners and hippies, but there’s no reason why they shouldn’t be for everyone. There are fortunes to be made creating businesses that install, maintain and empty them, collecting the inert compost for re-sale.

Every species creates waste in its own way. We humans have developed a fiendishly overcomplicated and unsustainable way of dealing with ours. That will change, and the toilet of the future will be low tech. If Bill Gates were a permaculturist and not a techy, he’d know this already.

Tags: ,

17 Comments on “Reinventing the toilet for the 21st century”

  1. Andy in Germany August 24, 2012 at 4:44 pm #

    There’s a whole lot of money to be lost as well, especially if you are working the current system, which is why the rules all back that way of working. Here in Germany the rules dictate a flush toilet, probably because sewage is an income stream (sorry) for the local towns who charge by the cubic metre.
    On the other hand of course, there’s no rule to say we must use the flush toilet…

    • Jeremy August 25, 2012 at 10:26 am #

      It’s strange how often the rules hold back progress, even though you can understand why they passed that law in the first place. Interesting that you have metered sewage charges though. We have a flat fee here, so I would pay the same even if I didn’t use the flush toilet.

  2. cmain August 25, 2012 at 8:55 am #

    I came across the Ventilation Improved Pit (VIP) toilet this summer when a camp my children attended raised some money for them in part of Africa:

    • Jeremy August 25, 2012 at 10:42 am #

      Some neat ideas in that pdf – thanks for sharing. I like the idea of digging smaller pits and then planting a tree on top.

  3. henry1941 August 25, 2012 at 10:12 pm #

    Off-mains toilets are commonplace in Sweden. The main thing is to have good ventilation to the collecting tank and take care about what goes into it ie no disinfectants etc. The contents is emptied composted.

    • Jeremy August 27, 2012 at 12:15 pm #

      Yes, all the most advanced versions of composting toilets seem to be from Sweden. It’s technology we should be learning from, definitely.

  4. silver price August 28, 2012 at 3:58 pm #

    The winner of the challenge? Caltech, which took home a $100,000 prize. Led by professor Michael Hoffman, the Caltech toilet runs on solar power, and breaks waste down into power-generating hydrogen.

  5. Tracuá September 11, 2012 at 8:57 am #

    Nice post. We were thinking the same when we saw the results. How can afford such a fancy thing?
    What I’d like to know: are there any good ideas about how to make a (compost or other) toilet in wetland areas? (We’re living in the Amazon.)


  1. The stove that generates electricity from sound | Make Wealth History - October 2, 2012

    […] couple of weeks ago I expressed my frustration with a competition to design a new kind of toilet for the third world, and a winning entry that looked like a physics lab with a toilet on top. That was the Gates […]

  2. Re-inventing the washing machine | Make Wealth History - January 14, 2014

    […] despite being hugely wasteful of water and reliant on complex and expensive infrastructure. There are better solutions. Some of them are simpler, some of them more complex, but they’re all smarter than purifying […]

  3. How Loowatt is rethinking the toilet | Make Wealth History - March 3, 2014

    […] year I wrote about the importance of reinventing the toilet for the 21st century – the need for waste systems that recognise waste as a resource, that capture and recycle […]

  4. Five alternatives to the flushing toilet | Make Wealth History - May 19, 2014

    […] as I’ve explained before, the flushing toilet is a dumb technology. It relies on huge and expensive infrastructure. It treats something that could be a useful […]

  5. Reinventing the cooker | Make Wealth History - January 14, 2015

    […] to cooking on gas too. There is an absurdity here, just as there is with combustion engines or purifying water to drinking standard and using it to flush toilets. We are going to have to rethink how we […]

  6. Giving it all away | Make Wealth History - March 30, 2015

    […] agenda gets rewritten around the particular interests of big donors, rather than the evidence base. As we saw with the Gates’ ‘reinvent the toilet’ competition, or One Laptop Per Child, the Silicon Valley philanthropists are drawn to technological solutions. […]

  7. Three big technologies to reconsider | Make Wealth History - May 18, 2015

    […] are a number of problems with flushing toilets, but the most obvious is the fact that we flush them with drinking water. We go to all the effort […]

  8. Why the Zuckerbergs need to be more boring | Make Wealth History - September 27, 2016

    […] couple of years ago I wrote about the Gates’ Foundation competition to reinvent the toilet. The aim was to find an innovative design that would leapfrog 2.5 billion people past the classic […]

  9. No such thing as a free gift, by Linsey McGoey | Make Wealth History - November 30, 2016

    […] cure rather than the patient dissemination of existing cures. Or with Bill Gates at the helm, exciting technology tends to win out over simpler solutions. With so much money to spend, big foundations can set the agenda, even […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: