growth politics

Britain’s population growth dilemma

Britain faces a bit of a conundrum at the moment. Actually it faces several, as you may have noticed, but there’s one that I don’t think has been articulated very often. That’s the problem of population, and its connection to the health of the economy.

There are many things that governments do to try and stimulate economic growth. Various strategies go in and out of fashion, but population doesn’t often get mentioned. It is, however, pretty important to economic growth. Put simply, the more people there are working and earning and spending, the bigger the contribution to GDP.

In his new book The Rise and Fall of Nations, Morgan Stanley’s chief strategist Ruchir Sharma describes ten key factors in identifying countries to invest in. One of them is population – “is the talent pool growing?” Population growth doesn’t automatically lead to economic growth, but it’s hard to do without it.”To produce strong economic growth in a country with a shrinking population is close to impossible,” says Sharma.

Britain is as reliant on this as anyone. From a fairly stable population through the 70s and 80s, growth rates in Britain ramped up dramatically in the late 90s, feeding into new low-paying jobs in the services sector. Analysing the links between Britain’s population and economic growth, economist Craig Berry writes that “it is not clear that the UK can develop a growth model in the foreseeable future which functions without strong population growth.”

This population growth hasn’t come from people having more children. The fertility rate in Britain has been below the replacement rate for forty years. The rise in population has come from people living longer and – you can see where this is going – migration.

Here’s a graph from the latest ONS bulletin:

ons-migration

Wait a minute, some might be saying. Does immigration create growth and jobs? Or do people migrate because Britain is growing and jobs are available? And the answer to that is both. People move to find work, which is why the graph above shows a dip in net migration during the recession. But the availability of workers also dictates where and when jobs will be created. (To take one example, how many families had an au pair when you were at school? The availability of young European women willing to work weird hours for low pay, on short term contracts, created that particular phenomenon of modern middle class parenting.) Immigration is both a cause and an effect of a growing economy.

So Britain relies on immigration to raise its working population and deliver economic growth. And yet we just voted to leave the EU, with concerns over levels of immigration playing a major part. If and how we actually leave the EU is yet to be determined, but the free movement of people is controversial. Plenty of people would like to see Britain out of the single market in order to reduce immigration. Others are trying to suggest some kind of unlikely compromise where we can stay in the single market but control our borders. Either way, we appear to be voting for lower immigration.

Does the general public know that lower immigration will hurt Britain economically? Probably not, given the media scare stories about scroungers and NHS tourists. When asked, 64% of people say that immigration is “a problem, not an opportunity”, and three quarters of people are in favour of reducing it.

But what’s the alternative? Endless immigration and a limitless UK population? Hardly sustainable, from an environmental as well as social angle.

Hence the dilemma.

There are no right answers to this. There are a few things we can do to help grow the workforce without population growth, and productivity measures we can use to get more value out of the workforce. We will need a strategy to cope with an aging population. But I reckon we’re also going to have to put a bit more thought into how we run an economy without economic growth.

10 comments

  1. Ageing is a social construct. Only 25% of your ageing journey is genetic, the rest is lifestyle and the impact of the messages that society gives to people. We live up or down to societies expectations. See the older person as a solution not a burden of infirmity and dependency on the young. If you do, that is what society will get. Lets be optimistic, encourage people to eat well, exercise, stay socially connected use their resourcefulness and resilience, value their contribution, in financial terms, support for families, in volunteering, as taxpayers and consumers. Let’s not disable our most experienced resource.

    1. True up to a point, but it’s not just about a drain on NHS or government services, but participation in work. People still expect to retire. And when they do, there are pensions to pay and so on.

      I should write a separate post on the challenges of an aging population though, it’s a topic in its own right.

  2. Room for a nod towards the Ecological Footprint research here, Jeremy. Britain is but one of the nations that is exponentially impacting planet earth (Impact of Human Activity = Population x Affluence x Technology, to use the Ehrlich formula) and the UK is a major contributor to the ecological deficit that appears to define the planet as overfull in the 1970s. The amazing acceleration of exponential growth is even less understood by the general public than the population dilemma. In my 75-year lifetime global population has grown from 2.3 to 7.4 billion and economic growth globally at 3% per annum leads to a doubling of global GDP every 23.3 years (hence knock on effects on resource depletion. pollution, species depletion, etc.) So let’s keep our eye on the planet and its vital support capacity which conventional economic and social policy-makers seem loath to do with their short-term thinking.

  3. Most leading economists belong to the neo-classical school and appear to see no limits to growth. Yet clearly there are. If politicians want to offer the people a better life, the answer is an increase in GDP / head, not an increase in gross GDP per se. You can get a higher GDP / head by keeping GDP the same and shrinking the population – gradually. How? Focus on productivity and innovation. And by NOT increasing the population, you do not need to spend lots of taxpayers money on additional infrastructure. Spend abit of this on improving sexual health education in schools etc and reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and you go someway towards reducing the population in the longer term. Now, how to deter all those pesty immigrants?

    1. The horse’s eye caps as to the side of the pathway, call it restricted context theories.

      — The point made here, as evident, population also relates to resource availability, in case globally, in matters of hard(helium as an example), and soft resources(psychological frenzy, mental health and population density as many, many other ones).

      To make matters short, it is just bad reasoning to not include the variables as a whole, all of them at the best of knowledge. Did not read the book, maybe you misinterpreted, since the suggestion is way of, restricted, confined reasoning, rather a pathway for politicians and public intellectuals, the level of self-help shelved oevres.

      Your postings have been qualitatively better these last few months, this pick or morsel of a suggestion is below your average work, sorry to say.

      m.

      1. Must be terrible living your life seeing everyone else as a problem.

        Is it your environmentalism that makes you dislike actual humans or are you drawn to environmental dismalism because you were already a misanthrope? I guess your inability to communicate clearly would be a cause of alienation from your fellow man.

  4. weird. we are probably less than 1 % efficient. perhaps increasing it and enjoying a bit more holiday time might be an idea. unfortunately increasing efficiency would slow resource use too, so not a good idea maybe?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s